Innocent is positive, understanding is negative, that's how it is usually understood.
In my experience, there is negativity in innocence and positivity in understanding.
In particular, there is something creative in innocence and understanding that is neither negative nor positive.
When looking at self-government and golf,
negating metaphors, affirming memories, neutralizing memories,
maintaining self-focus in everyday life is the right answer, but it is not always the right answer.
Flexibility is always needed.
The harsh industrial revolution era sadly threw the answer into disarray.
To focus, you need to be positive in your mind, positive in your understanding, and positive in your memory.
If society cannot adjust the focus of those who are misaligned in an era under overwhelming protection, how can we become a society that is not ashamed of the future era?
How can the young generation, the future generation, turn away from this history in favor of narrow-minded interests and leave the elderly who desperately want to live alone?
Wouldn't you be ashamed? For the rest of your life.
Since it is not practical for each individual or group to benefit, can the disappearance of individual rights and influences through appropriate responses to such situations really achieve safety and stability?
Wouldn't that bring about a crisis and a threat that goes beyond shame?
If it has been like this, how long will you continue to harm yourself?
Why should someone who gives a knife to a child who is self-harming risk being in danger for the rest of their life?
Why do you try to cut yourself and others with an invisible knife, saying it is for survival?
Wouldn't it be embarrassing again for whatever reason?
After being subdued, won't you regret it?
Don't you know that the regret of that moment is an act of cruelty passively inflicted on the decision maker who has no choice but to proceed with a negative judgment and execution when someone's judgment determines that it cannot be resolved with positive action?
For those who have no choice but to watch, whether they know everything or not, as if it were a coincidence or fate, isn't it sometimes rude to ask them to watch?
Is it weight, will, or choice?
If the strategy is typical for that situation and arrangement, why aren't additional positives presented?
You can discuss positivity in silence,
you can convey positivity by charging forward,
and you can feel positivity outwardly.
That's not Judaism. Whatever.
If someone risks their life for silence, for charging, for turning away, isn't that true love?
True, heart-warming love comes from practice. Be positive even if you make a mistake, and be positive even if you don't make a mistake.
Is there no such system? If there isn't one, why don't we make one?
If you get a chance, it doesn't seem that difficult.
I think there will be times when it seems difficult if you don't get a chance..
Is it hesitation?
Is it courtesy, caution, or an opportunity for us?
I think that opportunity is a phenomenon based on chance, so if you have a confident thought, you try not to hesitate.
At the same time, it's scary..
If someone has to risk their life to make you feel confident,
I try not to hesitate to save someone's life. Even in normal times.
I have stopped and watched because of the hypothesis that the standard of hesitation is the speed of decision and that it can threaten someone's life. I have endured desperately and loved with all my heart. And I love.
So I'm going to hesitate a little bit. I'm going to try not to hesitate in making that kind of judgment.
I saw with my own eyes a society where people were mentally and physically ill and unable to make safe decisions.
.
As I use Wonderfulgift as my author name, I am going to risk my life and boldly rush forward.
Happiness can never be given to others or embraced if you hesitate.
Trying to increase the density of happiness in the world
I'm trying to write and draw pictures so that such a society can be created. In fact, I've been drawing them. For over 22 years..
And the draft became a very beautiful and solid fairy tale.
If we have preserved our bonds and love for each other and lived together in such different ways, the proof is more than enough.
If I tell only the truth, I don't like it (I like it) because I get personal benefits.
If I tell lies, I get appropriate benefits, losses, praise, and criticism, so I don't like (I like) that appropriate silence.
If I just tell lies, I get criticized and attacked, so I don't like (I like) the way I live in a world that needs comfort and the silence.
How can we ensure that, even if we are creative and change the position of personal silence and emphasis, the expression of individual opinions leads to a formal, joyful silence and harmony that leads to understandable personal and multiplicity benefits, rather than just calculated benefits for the individual?
If there is a more important task than this, why? Are we practicing it?
We distort our judgmental abilities that we have worked so hard to cultivate,
we lose our priorities in areas that deal with intelligence, we give up the benefits that interest us,
we try to get along with others, and we try to convince them that our intellectual judgment is perfect.
Expecting that persuasion will fail, suffering, being threatened,
and finding that only a very small number of beneficiaries will be grateful to those who recognize it,
and putting themselves in a position where they can be criticized for giving up the benefit because they hate it,
and looking at themselves lying and abolishing the benefit,
and others lying and trying to get the benefit,
while thinking that it shouldn't be done that way and thinking that the method is different, devising a way to share the benefit or persuade those who have a different method,
and protecting the reason from becoming the result of the words and actions of another person,
The answer is clear on that timeline, but the reason we hesitate is actually because we lack sincere courtesy to ourselves and others.
Is this judgment self-harming?
If we had been a little more polite, we would not have said that it is natural to lie and gain benefits if we structure society by mentioning suggestions and controls that can match the board while giving minimal benefits to those who tell the truth.
Wasn't the way it exists now and in history meant to be protected?
If plunder and threats are natural,
how can we blame other countries and others?
That direction will create distorted rationalization.
I have seen countries in the world that admit their mistakes and grow, but I have never seen a country that ignores suffering and refuses to evolve and develop.
If it is not a case of a patient with mental problems advertising to many people,
and if it is someone who is sick,
even if a person without mental problems advertises to many people,
I think it is a time when salvation and relief experience and help are absolutely necessary.
It won't be a benefit, since I haven't fought a shameful fight.
If the direction of expressing my feelings changes, let's take a step forward without regrets in my life.
Let's walk with all our might.
The strength of you, whom I have watched for over 30 years, is more than that.
I love you. Even if I cease to exist in this world tomorrow. I love you passionately.
Therefore, the 'happiness revolution' is just beginning.