Even though time continues
to pass and the years flow
by relentlessly, standing alone
every moment does not solve the loneliness of life.
Whether the background of standing
alone is mild or harsh,
the impact of that environment
always varies from person to person.
If the difference is solitude,
solitude has both active
and passive meanings,
either by choosing it or by being chosen.
Isn't moving forward while thinking
about the depth and density of
solitude like standing alone?
Or is the loneliness it contains
somewhat evidence of the past
and present standing alone?
Are people who don't consider
the difference lonely?
Aren't people who
consider that difference lonely?
What does it mean to stand alone
in the marathon of life?
If we stand together on the horizon
and gaze at one place,
will our lonelinessbe reduced a little?
How can we work together to create
a safe world where people can share
ways to overcome hardships and
where their own decisions
can be their only answers?
How should the resulting differences
in standing alone be reconciled?
Without a peaceful opportunity
to acknowledge our differences
and respect each other,
the process can become
instrumentalized to suit individual needs.
Is that why that dangerous side
constantly creates loneliness
in some and many?
When rights instrumentalized
without a system are indiscriminately
abused by individuals, dialogue between them
becomes virtually impossible.
And allowing it to happen so easily
is like waiting for a conclusion that
ignores a foreseeable danger,
so there is no way around it.
Setting standards for the system
is a consideration to live stably
while recognizing the parts
that must be maintained
through dialogue.
If the standards of rights decided
for the majority to be together
are different from the standards
for individual situations and
standing alone, it would be
better to give special conditions and
time to all of us who are short on space.
Also, if the standards of others
do not perfectly match the perfect standards
of the system, it is much more accurate and
easier to learn through a reliable written book
than to hear the free oral expressions of others
that are unreliable and spontaneous.
If the opportunity to learn
about the world's standards
and the resulting conditions are optional,
then the conversational opportunity
is selectively viewed.
It brings about the dangers of absence
of dialogue and real loneliness.
So there are bound to be differences.
So, an alternative has to be applied.
But at the same time,
the infinite opportunity to work together
and continue to move forward
may be given to all of us equally,
either selectively or inevitably,